Wicomico County, MD
  Council Minutes
November 1, 2005

 

The County Council of Wicomico County, Maryland met in Executive Session on Tuesday, November 1, 2005 at 10:00 a.m., Council Chambers, Government Office Building, Salisbury, Maryland. All seven Council members, Anthony Sarbanes, Charles R. Dashiell, Jr., Edward T. Taylor, Stevie Prettyman, Gail M. Bartkovich, Marvin R. Long and Larry W. Dodd, were in attendance.

 

President Sarbanes brought the meeting to order.  On motion of Mrs. Bartkovich, second by Mr. Dashiell, the Minutes of October 18, 2005 were unanimously approved as amended.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR

Theodore E. Shea, II brought the following items of business before Council:

 

Circuit Court – A.D.A. Ramp: The Circuit Court is prepared to commence with the construction of the handicapped ramp and is now requesting the transfer of $75,929.92, which had been previously reserved by Council.  On motion of Mrs. Prettyman, second by Mr. Dashiell, Council unanimously approved the request.

 

Government Office Building – Elevator Repairs:  Mr. Shea announced that the elevator will be out of operation from November 21, 2005 to January 2, 2006, to effect repairs.  The County Council shall conduct its Executive Sessions at the Wicomico Youth & Civic Center in the interim.  Mr. Shea also advised that an employee would be located in the lobby area to help accommodate members of the public who are unable to use the stairs to reach second and third floor offices.

 

Mr. Dodd referenced a power outage during a recent City Council meeting and asked if specific lighting deficiencies had been addressed. Mr. Shea responded that emergency lighting has a life span of approximately 90 minutes, sufficient time to allow evacuation of the building; however, additional lighting has already been installed.

 

Enterprise Zone: John Pick, Salisbury City Administrator, has forwarded documentation and a request for Council’s approval of an Enterprise Zone designation for Lowe’s of Salisbury.  This designation was granted by the Salisbury City Council at their

October 10, 2005 meeting.  By motion of Mr. Long, second by Mr. Taylor, Council unanimously approved the request as submitted.

 

 Update on Facility:  Mr. Shea referred to a prior work session whereby Council questioned the status for use of the former Drill Academy facility.  He further stated that the general premise is that the facility is to be used to house Work Release inmates; additionally, those vacated spaces would be used to house U.S. Marshal’s Service detainees.  It was the intent to make the space available to INS detainees, but this is not currently feasible, due to Federal money constraints associated with recent Gulf hurricanes.  At Mr. Dodd’s inquiry, Douglas Devenyns, Director, reiterated that the available space at the Detention Center would be used by U.S. Marshal’s Service detainees from its Greenbelt facility.  The former Drill Academy facility would house Work Release and Weekend inmates.  Mrs. Bartkovich asked when this would take place.

Mr. Devenyns stated that upon completion of minor modifications, the facility would  be operational within two to three weeks and would not require additional fencing.  He also stated that it is a matter of hiring personnel, a process underway.  Mrs. Prettyman asked if the facility would require the same personnel; Mr. Devenyns stated that 18 personnel are still needed.  At Mr. Taylor’s inquiry, Mr. Devenyns stated the maintenance position would entail approximately 20 hours per week at the Detention Center Annex. 

Mrs. Prettyman said the initial goal was to eventually house 45 U.S. Marshal’s Service detainees, with the possibility of housing 80; what is the per Diem rate?  Mr. Devenyns confirmed her statement, stating the current per Diem is $55.71.   Mr. Long also asked the food requirements for inmates.  Mr. Dashiell asked if the projected per Diem would be sufficient to cover costs.  Mr. Devenyns responded that it would be a break even situation based on 45 inmates; exceeding that number would produce revenue for the County.  On motion of Mr. Long, second by Mr. Dashiell, Council unanimously approved the proposed use of the facility.  Mr. Devenyns also responded to Mrs. Prettyman that the start up costs have been budgeted and have only been used to pay maintenance and utilities costs.

 

Winter Conference:  Mr. Shea reminded Council that the MACo Winter Conference is approaching.  Staff needs to know the number of individuals planning to attend.

 

IT Agreement:  Mr. Shea brought attention to an agreement involving the County, City of Salisbury and the Board of Education which was approved last spring.  The agreement is to share a common network; while the City and County had approved the agreement, the Board of Education requested certain changes within the agreement.  Ray Micciche, Director, IT, is now requesting that Council approve and sign the revised Agreement

(the agreement has been reviewed by the County Attorney).  Mr. Taylor motioned to approve the amended Agreement and received a second by Mr. Long.  Mrs. Bartkovich asked if the Board of Education has installed its network resources at the BOE tower on Mt. Hermon Road.  Mr. Micciche explained that a small subscriber unit was installed, but the major portion has not, since the Board of Education had not yet signed the three-party Agreement.  Once all parties have signed, the Board will fully join into the project.

Council then unanimously approved the amended Agreement.

 

Appointments to Vacant Positions:  Mr. Shea submitted his recommendation that

the current Deputy Administrative Director, S. Michael Thompson, be appointed as

Human Resources Director.  Likewise, Mr. Shea stated that he has designated

Frederick C. Harris as Acting Deputy Administrative Director, until it has been determined whether the position would be filled.  It should be noted that Mr. Harris would continue his responsibilities as Purchasing Agent.  Mrs. Prettyman stated that Council might consider holding a discussion as to whether the Deputy Administrative Director would be filled; during the previous meeting, she had made the suggestion that the position remain vacant.  Mr. Sarbanes responded that the position is vacant; in effect, Mr. Harris would be performing additional duties.  Mr. Shea explained that filling the position would depend upon the level of activity within the department; there are times it is necessary to have a Deputy Administrative Director is necessary.   Mr. Dodd supported keeping the position vacant, with Mr. Harris serving as the Acting Deputy.

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Patricia B. Petersen, Director, submitted the Contingency Report, reflecting a balance of $966,800.

 

Nuisance Abatement Billing:  Mrs. Petersen also submitted a request to pay for Nuisance abatement services at multiple properties, in the amount of $1108.75.  By motion of Mr. Long, second by Mr. Dashiell, Council unanimously approved payment of the billing stated above.

 

General Obligation Bond Resolution:  In summary, the Resolution authorizes the County to provide issuance and sale, upon its faith and credit, of $8,525,000 aggregate principal amount, to be designated “Public Improvement Bonds of 2005, Second Issue” and to be dated November 15, 2005 and issued as a serial maturity. Bonds shall mature on annual serial maturities on November 1 in the years 2006 through 2020.  The Resolution provides that the principal of the bonds shall be paid in 15 installments, bearing interest payable each May 1st and November 1st .  The County may prepay the bonds maturing on or after November 1, 2016 in whole or in part, beginning November 1, 2015 upon thirty days notice. Bonds are subject to the public competitive bidding process, which shall take place November 15, 2005 at the Finance Department, Room 102.  If Council is not in session at time of award, the Administrative Director shall make such award by order, after consulting with the Finance Director and the financial advisor to the County. Principal amount, along with other sources of revenue, shall be used to finance, including by reimbursing prior project expenditure, all or a portion of the costs of certain capital projects for the Public Works Department, Wor-Wic Community College and the Board of Education, a contingency fund and costs and expenses in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of such bonds.  The Resolution becomes effective immediately upon its adoption by Council.

 

On motion of Mr. Dashiell, second by Mr. Taylor, Council unanimously approved the Resolution as submitted.

 

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

P. Rai Sharma, Director, reviewed the following items of business:

 

Subdivision Plat Review

Name:              subdivision for Hall                               DPW No. 29-05

Location:          Levin Dashiell Rd.

Applicant:         Doug Jones

Owner:             Pamela Hall

 

The Applicant proposes to subdivide an existing 3.58 acre parcel into two lots; both proposed lots would front and have access on Levin Dashiell Road, a major collector.

Following review, the Department of Public Works recommends approval of this subdivision by the Planning Commission, subject to the following conditions:

1) the final plat shall comply with subdivision and Forest Conservation regulations; 

2) Health Department approval is required; 3) a fifty percent set-aside shall be established by both deed and plat; 4) a 50 ft. Flood Protection setback must be established on this property along Quantico Creek.  Following review, Council concurred with the recommendation and all conditions.

 

Bid Award:  On motion of Mrs. Prettyman, second by Mr. Taylor, Council unanimously approved award of bid in the amount of $57,499, to Somerset Marine, for the Tony Tank Dam Lining project.  Upon Mrs. Bartkovich’s inquiry, Mr. Sharma assured Council that this project would not impact area traffic.

 

Miscellaneous

 

Mr. Sharma advised that the Department would be issuing billings to property owners at King William’s Court, as the result of repairs that were required, but not addressed by the subdivision’s Homeowners’ Association. 

 

Mr. Sharma, in response to an inquiry by Mr. Long, gave a brief slide presentation

highlighting conflicts of responsibility for maintenance of specific roads and streets between the City of Salisbury and Wicomico County.  The slides identified how certain roads have been broken into small stretches, some under the jurisdiction of the City and some the responsibility of the County.  This is primarily the result of annexations into the City.  Mr. Sharma stated this is very confusing to the public as well as City/County Roads staff.  Mr. Dodd added that this presents a serious problem to law enforcement agencies, also.  Mr. Sharma suggested that Council consider approaching the City of Salisbury to devise an agreement that would use a “common sense” approach to designating maintenance responsibility for affected roads.  Mr. Sharma has had no success in his discussions with the City.  Mr. Sarbanes asked the Administrative Director to follow up with the City.  Mrs. Prettyman suggested that perhaps a long term solution might be sought at the State level through ordinance changes; this could be discussed during Council’s upcoming meeting with the Lower Eastern Shore Delegation.  On a final note,

Mr. Sharma brought to light the issue of a property owner whose property is in the County, having been denied access to a City road from that property.  Mr. Sharma stated he does not know of any law or ordinance that allows this. 

 

 

President Sarbanes wished to recognize Delegate Rudolph Cane and former Council member Henry Parker, in the audience.

 

BOARD OF ELECTIONS

Judy Ritter, Director, came before Council to provide an update on precincts and the need to increase the number of voting locations to accommodate voters during the 2006 elections.  Mrs. Ritter stated the importance of advertising these changes to enhance voter awareness.  Mrs. Prettyman, Mr. Dashiell and Mr. Sarbanes thanked the entire Elections staff for their work and dedication to serving the public.

 

 

Mrs. Bartkovich, on behalf of the Council, presented a resolution in recognition of

Mrs. Ritter being chosen as the 2005 Elections Official of the Year- State of Maryland.

 

Delegate Cane reiterated that elections should not be taken for granted and encouraged advertising these changes in elections precincts as soon as possible to obtain the best results.

 

SHORE TRANSIT/TRI COUNTY COUNCIL

Rob Hart, Transportation Director of TCC, briefed Council on the application for public transportation grant monies for fiscal year 2007.  Mr. Hart added that, as required by the State,  a public hearing would be held on November 8, 2005 from 5:00-7:00 p.m. at the Salisbury Area Chamber of Commerce offices.

 

This region is eligible to apply for operating funds in the amount of $1,947,688 and requests a $271,000 local match from Wicomico County.

 

In addition, the Tri-County Council is requesting funding for two large replacement vehicles, two small replacement vehicles, maintenance equipment and demand response software, totaling $674,000; this would require a local match of $22,466.

 

Mr. Hart responded to specific questions from Council regarding the deadline for submission of the application to the State, capacities for buses, as well as the amounts being funded by Somerset and Worcester Counties ($230,000 and $240,000 respectively).

 

Mr. Hart also addressed the necessity to reduce funds and services in the Salisbury Urban Area, to the $150,000 level.  Once again, Council members agreed the funding issue would be a worthy item of discussion with the Lower Shore Delegation.

 

At Mr. Hart’s request and by motion of Mr. Dodd, second by Mr. Taylor, Council approved local support at the requested levels by a vote of six ayes and Mrs. Prettyman voting “no” to commitment of increased funding levels at this time.

 

PUBLIC HEARING – DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

John Redden, Deputy Director, conducted a public hearing for an amendment to the Wicomico County Water and Sewer Plan, allowing inclusion of one commercial development and one residential development.  Several commercial buildings including the Bank of Delmarva, are proposed at the corner of Beaglin Park Drive and U. S. Route 50, with a projected seer and water usage of 1,750 gallons per day.  Rowan’s Mill will consist of 185 residential units located on St. Lukes Road near the Bypass with an estimated sewer and water usage of 46,250 gallons per day.  The commercial development will be served by public water and sewer from the City of Salisbury, while the residential development will be served by public water and sewer from the City of Fruitland. 

 

 

Mr. Sarbanes called for public comments, however, there were none.

 

Calling for Council comments, Mrs. Prettyman asked if Council is assured that the required capacities exist.   Mr. Redden responded that both municipalities have submitted letter confirming that there are sufficient capacities for services.  Mrs. Bartkovich stated that while these projects are small, there probably are much larger projects that would require amendments.  Mrs. Bartkovich also referred to the fact that Mr. Pusey, Salisbury Public Works, had met with Council and stated that the City was developing a monitoring system to track sewer capacity, anticipated to be completed within three to six months and would be shared with the County; to date, this has not been received.

Mrs. Bartkovich also referred to two draft documents on the State’s Maryland Dept. of the Environment webpage dealing with water and wastewater capacity;  MDE is accepting comments on the drafts through November.  Mrs. Bartkovich also referred to a section of the MDE wastewater capacity plan dealing with subdivisions plats, stating that

“A state or local authority may not record or approve a subdivision plat unless any approved facility for conveying, storing or treating water, sewage or solid waste to serve the proposed development would be 1) completed in time to serve the proposed development and 2) adequate to serve the proposed development once completed, without overloading any water supply systems, sewage system or solid waste acceptance facility.”  She suggested that in the future, Council needs much more information from the City when a County Water and Sewer Plan amendment is required, i.e., is there capacity now; would the capacity be available when the treatment plant is upgraded; is the capacity held forever or does it “sunset”, causing a developer to re-apply? 

Mrs. Bartkovich said she believes the County needs more communication with the City about these questions and concerns. 

 

Mr. Long asked if it is feasible to ask a municipality to submit some sort of certification that would be submitted with the request for the Water & Sewer Plan amendment.

Mr. Sharma responded that these concerns have been raised before and is one of the reasons the State has placed the draft recommendations on its website.  He added that many municipalities are hesitant to support the State recommendations because of the necessity to commit to and reserve capacities for specific developments that may be reduced due to future market trends.  Agreeing with Mrs. Bartkovich, Mr. Sharma reiterated that the County needs confirmation from all municipalities that such services are or would be available to subdivisions being built or expanded.  Mr. Sharma also referenced the question raised recently as to the County’s legal obligation when approving Water and Sewer Plan amendments, should the municipality find itself unable to provide the services.  Mr. Long suggested that an “encumbrance procedure” similar to that used by procurement offices, be considered.  It was agreed upon that only the County Council has the authority to require the certification document.  County staff will draft a document for Council approval.

 

Mr. Dashiell stated that once again, it is important to define where this certification is requested in the process of the development; currently, it is always the last step in the process before Council is expected to review for approval.  Mr. Dashiell stated it would be much better if such a decision is made in the beginning of the development process.

Mr. Sharma agreed this has been done, but there is still the question of the certification requirement.  Mr. Taylor, while in general agreement, stated that future requirements should not affect the subject of today’s public hearing and motioned to approve the request.  Mrs. Bartkovich stated that her concerns were directed toward future decisions, not for today’s decision.  Mrs. Prettyman asked if Mr. Pusey could be asked to return to Council; Mr. Sharma reminded Council that Mr. Pusey would not be able to do this until authorized by the City of Salisbury.  Mrs. Prettyman responded that she would still like to have a City representative meet with Council.

 

President Sarbanes then called for a second to Mr. Taylor’s motion, which was provided by Mrs. Bartkovich and received unanimous approval.

 

PUBLIC HEARING – LEASE AGREEMENT

 

Mr. Shea conducted the following public hearing:  Notice is hereby given in compliance with Section 22-2(G) of the Wicomico County Code, that the County Council will hear public comment on a proposed resolution to consider a Lease Agreement between Wicomico county and Robert B. White, Evelyn H. White, Deborah W. Poole and George H. White, doing business as White Realty, in which wicomico county would lease an area consisting of 1250 square feet on the premises known as 132 East Main Street, Suite 100, for a term of one year with the option renew or extend the initial term of the Lease Agreement.  The premises would serve as the office for the Local Management Board’s

SIT/TEEN program, funded through the State of Maryland.

 

Dr. Eileen Matlack was present to answer any public comments, however no comments were received.

 

Calling for Council comments, Mr. Taylor expressed his support for this program and motioned to approve the lease agreement.  Douglas Devenyns, Director, Dept. of Corrections, also commented on the LMB program designed for inmates and their children.  Mrs. Prettyman asked if there is any room at the former Drill Academy to house the program; Mr. Devenyns replied while it was originally considered, the facility is no longer considered suitable under the current plan.  While this might be considered in the future, there are logistics considerations, among others, that are not conducive to the program.  The motion received a second from Mrs. Prettyman and was unanimously carried.

 

PUBLIC COMMENTS

 

Messrs. William Caine and Don Sorrenti, Vice President of Fox Chase Homeowners’

Association, came before Council to express their concerns about vandalism taking place in their development.  Mr. Caine shared pictures of damage incurred in the common area and in residents’ yards.  Mr. Sorrenti also reviewed a summary of incidents since 2004.

Both gentlemen stated that while the County Sheriff’s Office has responded to calls, more patrols are needed.  Sheriff Nelms responded to their concerns, quoted statistics on increased incidents of  vandalism countywide, the lack of sufficient manpower in the Sheriff’s Office. In response to Mrs. Bartkovich’s inquiry, Mr. Caine stated that Fox Chase does not have a Neighborhood Crime Watch program in place.  Sheriff Nelms offered to work with the Homeowners’ Association to establish a Watch on the subdivision.

 

COUNCIL COMMENTS

 

Mrs. Prettyman stated that the Daily Times, local newspaper, has challenged twenty businesses to donate $1,000 each to cover the costs of the Winter Wonderland holiday display and stated she would like the County to donate $1,000, also.  It is unknown at this point whether there has been any positive response.  Mr. Dodd and Mr. Taylor both said they could support Mrs. Prettyman’s request.  Mrs. Prettyman motioned to donate $1,000; the motion received a second by Mr. Taylor and was unanimously approved.  At Mrs. Bartkovich’s inquiry, Mr. Shea advised that the display is housed at the Public Safety Complex.  The display has been set up by County employees in the past, but it should be noted that it is now beyond the time to set up for this year. 

 

Mrs. Prettyman asked for clarification about Mr. King Burnett’s letter to Mr. Jack Lenox, asking for Planning and Zoning’s assistance to a new Greater Salisbury Committee Task Force addressing growth issues.  Mr. Lenox stated that his department responds daily to many requests from citizens’ groups, organizations, etc.  Mr. Lenox intends to meet with this new group to determine their expectations and to keep communications open, but ultimately, would take Council’s direction on the matter.  Mrs. Prettyman asked if there are duplications of effort; Mr. Lenox said there were, but the Department would help coordinate so duplications would be minimized.  Mrs. Prettyman wished to make sure it is understood that these citizens groups have not been appointed by Council. While the County is responsive in the spirit of cooperation, Mrs. Prettyman is concerned about duplication of efforts.  Mr. Long said the Greater Salisbury Committee has a history of addressing local issues, which is their original purpose and encourages cooperation with them.

 

Mr. Taylor announced that he, Mayor Tilghman, Linda Hardman and Dr. George Whitehead would be traveling to Washington, D.C. to receive an award to Wicomico County/City of Salisbury as being named one of the most outstanding cities in the country in crime reduction.   Seven years ago, Wicomico County’s crime rates were second only to Baltimore City; those statistics have been reduced dramatically.

 

With no further business to be discussed and by motion of Mr. Dodd, second by

Mr. Dashiell, Council unanimously approved adjournment of Executive Session.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minutes of November 1, 2005

 

 

 

                                                __________________________________________

                                                Anthony Sarbanes, President

 

                                                __________________________________________

                                                Charles R. Dashiell, Jr., Vice President

 

                                                __________________________________________

                                                Edward T. Taylor, District 1

 

                                                __________________________________________

                                                Stevie Prettyman, District 2

 

                                                __________________________________________

                                                Gail M. Bartkovich, District 3

 

                                                __________________________________________

                                                Marvin R. Long, District 4

 

                                                __________________________________________

                                                Larry W. Dodd, District 5

 

 

 

__________________________

Theodore E. Shea, II

Administrative Director