Wicomico County, MD
Council Minutes
Aug. 2, 2005
The County Council of
Wicomico County, Maryland met in Executive Session on Tuesday,
President Sarbanes brought
the meeting to order. By motion of
Mrs. Bartkovich, second by Mr. Dodd, the minutes of
On motion of Mrs. Bartkovich,
second by Mr. Long, the Urban Services Commission minutes were unanimously
approved.
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR
Theodore E. Shea, II,
submitted the following points of business:
Approval of Licenses: On
motion of Mrs. Prettyman, second by Mrs. Bartkovich, Council unanimously
approved the issuance of one-day alcohol licenses for the following events:
Salisbury
Jr. Chamber of Commerce,
Mid
Delmarva Family YMCA,
Wicomico
Republican Club,
Tax Exemption Request: The East
Side Men’s Club is requesting a tax exemption for personal property and
provided annual statements of charitable contributions. The organization is required to apply on
an annual basis. On motion of Mr.
Taylor, second by Mr. Long, Council unanimously approved the request.
Approval of Agreements: The
Tri-County Council and
Use of Stadium: Comcast Spectacor is requesting permission to use Perdue Stadium to
stage an event on
Reappointment: The
Lower Shore Workforce Alliance is requesting the reappointment of Linda McCann
to its Board. Ms. McCann would
continue to serve as the
TEFAP Program:
Board of Education: Dr.
Charlene C. Boston, Superintendent of Schools, is requesting an extension for
submission of this year’s Capital Improvements Budget. As is the case
each year, the State of
Appointment: Mr. Shea
advised that the School Building Commission requires an appointment to fill a
vacancy. Mr. Long nominated G. Matthew
Drew; there were no other nominations. Mr. Dodd provided a second and Council
unanimously approved the motion.
Submission of Proposal
–
Mr. Jeffers asked Council to
support the concept of the horse park in
Mrs. Bartkovich wished to
speak strictly to the internal process of submission; that the Charter states
Council shall act as a body and the fact that Council members were not
contacted to concur with the July 28th letter prior to submission to
the State. Mrs. Bartkovich further
stated that Mr. Sarbanes had acted outside his authority, has concerns about
his continued leadership as President, suggested a vote of no confidence and
that Council should discuss restructuring of authority/leadership.
Mrs. Prettyman provided a
second to the motion.
Mr. Sarbanes conducted a roll
call vote: Mrs. Bartkovich, yes;
Mr. Long, no; Mr. Dodd, abstention; Mrs. Prettyman, yes;
Mr. Taylor,
no; Mr. Sarbanes, no. The motion failed. In response to a question posed by Mrs.
Bartkovich, Mr. Baker,
Mr. Long suggested that a
Council member offer a motion to withdraw the proposal; however, there was no
response. Further discussion
resulted in the County Attorney explaining that at this point, the proposal is
not a legally approved document by Council; the only vote that would be
appropriate, if Council chose, would be to ratify previous action; how this
would be viewed by the State is unknown. Mr. Baker also said that Council could
move to withdraw the application.
Mr. Sarbanes then called for a motion to withdraw.
Mr. Dodd stated his concerns
that other County departments had sufficient time to review the proposal while
Council was unaware of the RFP. He
referred to other incidents when time limits required County staff to call
Council members to reach a consensus on an issue. While this might be a good
project, Council has had no time to determine the financial commitment
involved; therefore, he could not give his support.
Ms. Kathleen McLain addressed
Council and provided a brief explanation of the process by which she became
aware of the proposed horse park and the combined efforts to locate a suitable
site and help prepare a proposal for the State in very limited time. She
explained that there is no commitment, financial or otherwise, on
anyone’s part associated with the proposal. Ms. McLain appealed to Council to
consider the revenue that could be generated to meet many needs in the
County. Site visits would occur in
each County submitting a proposal; the Maryland Stadium Authority intends to
make a decision by December so the project could be presented to the Maryland
Legislature in January.
There was dialogue between
Ms. McLain and Mrs. Prettyman regarding financial commitment on the part of the
chosen County. Mrs. Prettyman stated that the State would be looking to the
chosen County for a financial investment in the project.
Ms. McLain again stated that
at this point in time and the amount of information available, it was not
possible for a County to make a financial commitment; perhaps later in the
process, the county may not want to make the required commitment. Mrs. Prettyman responded that the State
document states a commitment would depend upon the site, amenities, etc., and that
the cost allocation, both capital and operating, between the State and local
government, would depend upon the projected economic benefit to each and the
resources available to the local jurisdiction; also, the nominating
jurisdiction should indicate the range of possible capital contributions to the
project; therefore, there would be a financial obligation. Ms. McLain said the scope of the project
would require public, private and political commitment.
Mr. Dodd thanked Ms. McLain
for her hard work, but stated the elected Council must act as one body.
Again, Mr. Sarbanes asked for
a motion to not support the proposal; there was none.
Mr. Baker advised that the
proposal should either be supported or not supported by the Council and not
left as it is. Mr. Long then
motioned to support the submitted proposal.
The motion received a second
by Mr. Taylor and the following roll call vote ensued: Mrs. Bartkovich,
abstention; Mr. Long, yes; Mr. Dodd, abstention; Mrs. Prettyman, no; Mr.
Taylor, yes; Mr. Sarbanes, yes. The
motion was carried with three favorable votes and one vote in opposition. Upon Mr. Sarbanes’ inquiry, Mr.
Baker responded that he would research the law on abstentions, while
acknowledging the three-to-one vote.
Mrs. Prettyman also asked Mr. Baker to research the legality of retroactive
approvals.
Mr. Sarbanes stated that on
occasion, a Council President or the leader of any group must act to keep
things going and that was his rationale in this instance. Submission of the proposal was
contingent upon Council action today.
Mrs. Prettyman stated that no other Council person had ever committed
County resources in like manner; she suggested a closed session to further
discuss the issue.
Letter of Support Request: Mr. Shea
advised Council that the Maryland Economic Development Assistance Authority and
Fund has agreed to fund Machining Technologies, Inc. (MaTech)
$250,000 toward the purchase, renovation and acquisition of equipment for the
former Sealy plant in the
Resignation: Council
is advised of the resignation of Thomas Calo, Director, Human Resources. With
the employee salary appeals process continuing, Mr. Shea requested Council
concurrence to hire Mr. Calo on an hourly basis to complete this process. On motion of Mr. Long, second by Mr.
Dodd, Council unanimously approved the request. Mrs. Bartkovich asked the number of
appeals in process; Mr. Shea replied that number is unknown at this time, but
employee appeals are first addressed through the Singer Group; a second level
of appeal with Human Resources; and a final appeal through the Administrative
Director. Mrs. Bartkovich asked to
be advised if any appeals are ultimately sent to Mr. Shea.
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
Patricia B. Petersen,
Director, introduced Mr. John Przylepa, who has
joined the staff as Grants Developer. Council members extended a welcome to Mr.
Przylepa.
Financial Report: As the
first meeting of the month, Mrs. Petersen submitted the Contingency Report,
citing usage of $2,000 since the beginning of this fiscal year (July 1) and
reflecting a balance of $973,000.
Mrs. Petersen also reported
payment of two bills for grass cutting services, $250 and $125, in accordance
with the County’s Nuisance Code.
Proposed Legislation: Mrs.
Petersen referred to notification by the State of
Mrs.
Prettyman expressed her opinion that the legislation would move forward; the
Counties
are being placed on notice of the chance of higher risk that might affect the
level of funding to counties. Mr.
Taylor remarked that he did not support this move by the State and does not
want to see the County placed in any more risk than the existing
conditions. Mr. Sarbanes called for
a motion. Mrs. Prettyman motioned
not to support the commercial paper, which was seconded by Mr. Taylor and was
followed by a roll call vote: Mrs.
Prettyman, no; Mr. Taylor, no; Mrs. Bartkovich, no; Mr. Long, yes; Mr. Dodd,
no; Mr. Sarbanes yes.
Note: this motion was amended on
Mardela
Springs Volunteer Fire Company has certified to two full time paramedics and
provided their Workers Compensation; therefore, Mrs. Petersen would pay the
appropriation of $68,000 plus $5,000 for Workers Compensation.
Parsonsburg
Volunteer Fire Department: Council
action is required. The fire company has certified one full time paramedic and
three part time paramedics. The
company has 24/7 coverage with Pittsville; while the Finance Department is
prepared to pay the Workers Compensation amount, Council is asked to make a
determination as to the amount to be paid in
Delmar
Volunteer Fire Department has certified to two full time paramedics; however, a
copy of their Workers Compensation provision has not been received. Mrs. Petersen has sent the full
Pittsville
Volunteer Fire Company has certified to one full time paramedic and certifies
that 24 hr./7days per week coverage is provided using two part time EMTS in
conjunction with Parsonsburg. Mr.
Dodd motioned to approve full appropriation; the motion received a second from
Mrs. Bartkovich and was unanimously approved.
Respiratory
Protection: Mrs. Petersen recalled that when
respiratory protection was being proposed, it was comprised of items such as
respiratory physicals, spirometry tests, respirator
fit tests, EKGs, etc. During a work session last year, Dr. Alcorta,
State Medical Director, MIEMS, was asked to identify tests deemed necessary for
respiratory protection. Dr. Alcorta responded that respiratory physicals are required,
while the other tests mentioned are geared more to HazMat
operations. Based on this
information, Mrs. Petersen has been processing billings solely for respiratory
physicals; however, the County’s practice has been questioned by several
volunteer fire companies, stating that it was their understanding that the
County would pay for respiratory physicals, spirometry
tests and respirator fit tests.
Council is now asked to define which tests are to be paid. Mrs. Prettyman asked exactly what the
budget appropriation covers; Mrs. Petersen responded that no actual definition
of coverage was made, with the fire companies assuming Council accepted their
proposal for coverage of all tests.
Mr. Dodd remarked that if the additional tests are not required to meet
the standard of “respiratory protection,” why would the County pay?
Mrs. Petersen replied that additional medical equipment is needed to perform
certain tests and given the fire companies’ assumption, the company that
performs the tests was under the impression the County would make reimbursement
for the services. Mr. Dodd said
this does not answer the question and emphasize why reimburse for unnecessary
tests, according to the State Medical Director. Mr. Taylor stated that reimbursement for
all tests would exceed the County’s appropriation for respiratory
protection and moved to restrict reimbursement to the required respiratory
physical. The motion received a
second by Mr. Dodd and was unanimously approved.
DEPARTMENT
OF PUBLIC WORKS
P. Rai Sharma, Director, submitted the following reports and
items of business:
Speed
Limit Reduction: Mr. Sharma has received many requests
from residents of
Council
was provided the Building Construction Report, comparing the total number of
new homes, commercial properties, municipal permits and associated fees
collected for a four-year period.
Mr. Sharma stated that the number of houses in the County is actually
declining, as compared to an increase within municipalities, due in part, to
increased annexation.
Update
on
Recycling
Station: With the removal of the Recycling
Station located at
Tire
Amnesty Day: This annual event will take place August
13th, 7:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m, at the Newland Park
Landfill,
SHERIFF’S
OFFICE
R.
Hunter Nelms, Sheriff, came before Council to request a transfer of funds from
the Sheriff’s Office Salaries account to the Contractual Account, to fund
the Firearms Instructor position.
The $51,084 transfer amount was funded through the Salaries and simply
needs to be transferred. On motion
of Mr. Dodd, second by Mr. Taylor, Council unanimously approved the request.
On
another note, Sheriff Nelms referenced news information from the Princess Anne
Police Department regarding the acquisition of a surplus Army helicopter to
supplement the State Police helicopter availability. Sheriff Nelms wished to emphasize that
while he could support the professional concept, it has been made clear that
Mrs.
Bartkovich thanked the Sheriff for the report on the usage of the
Office’s vehicle fleet. Sheriff Nelms stated this report would be
generated on a periodic basis.
At
Mrs. Prettyman’s inquiry, Sheriff Nelms
confirmed that National Night Out takes place this evening.
Edgar
A Baker, Jr.,
Mr.
Bryant explained that public meetings are held with property owners to provide
information and address concerns.
He also responded to questions from Council as to the areas, such as
Kilbirnie, Quail Ridge, etc., that might be affected. Mr. Bryant continued to explain that
while property owners might prefer to have a tree topped, Council should be
aware that the FAA would pay only once for each obstruction.
This
means that if a tree were topped rather than cut down, the County would have to
absorb the cost when the tree grew and once again became an obstruction. He also assured Council that this project
would not adversely affect existing buffers. On motion of Mr. Long, second by Mr.
Taylor, Council unanimously approved the Amendment.
PUBLIC
COMMENTS
Mr.
Kenneth Holland asked how many homes would be removed due to the Amendment just
discussed. Mr. Bryant responded
that no structures would be affected.
COUNCIL
COMMENTS
Mr.
Sarbanes recalled that
Mrs.
Prettyman also referred to a draft letter to the Mayor of Salisbury that
requires Council concurrence. On
motion of Mr. Taylor, second by Mrs. Prettyman, Council unanimously approved
the draft letter as submitted to Council.
Mr.
Long referred to the fact that Tristan Schweiger,
news reporter covering County government, is leaving The Daily Times. Mr. Sarbanes read and presented a letter
of appreciation from Council, recognizing Mr. Schweiger’s
professionalism in reporting County issues and to extend best wishes as he
continues his journalism career.
Mrs.
Prettyman asked when Council would continue discussion of the County retirement
system, including an actuary with LEOPS in consideration. She further stated
that a recent presentation involved the
With
no further business to be discussed and on motion of Mr. Taylor, second by Mr.
Dodd, Council unanimously approved adjournment.
_____________________________
Anthony
Sarbanes, President
_____________________________
Edward
T. Taylor, District 1
_____________________________
Stevie Prettyman, District 2
_____________________________
Gail
M. Bartkovich, District 3
_____________________________
Marvin
R. Long, District 4
_____________________________
Larry
W. Dodd, District 5
__________________________
Theodore E. Shea, II
Administrative Director