Wicomico County, MD
Council Minutes
June 17, 2003

 

The County Council of Wicomico County, Maryland, met in Executive Session on Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 10:00 a.m., Council Chambers, Government Office Building, Salisbury, Maryland. Present were Anthony Sarbanes, President; Charles R. Dashiell, Jr.,

Vice President; Edward T. Taylor, Stevie Prettyman, Gail M. Bartkovich, Marvin R. Long, and Larry W. Dodd.

 

Mr. Sarbanes called for any additions or corrections to the Minutes of June 3, 2003.  On motion made by Mr. Dashiell, seconded by Mr. Taylor, and unanimously carried, the Minutes were approved as written.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR

 

Mr. Theodore E. Shea, II, recalled the federal mandate for the presence of law enforcement personnel (Sheriff’s Deputies) at the Salisbury-Ocean City: Wicomico Regional Airport, following the events of September 11,2002 and that effective May 31, 2003, the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) withdrew its financial support.  The Sheriff’s Department has continued its presence at the Passenger Screening Point without the benefit of TSA funding and estimates to expend approximately $15,000 in overtime. The Sheriff has advised his budget does not have sufficient salary funds to meet this expenditure and requests Council direction. Consultation with the Director of Finance suggests Council can, (1) authorize up to $15,000 from Contingency or, (2) acknowledge the problem without making a transfer at this time and wait for the auditors to transfer from Contingency as a final accounting adjustment.  Mr. Taylor made a motion to accept second recommendation. Mr. Long seconded the motion. On call for the question, Mrs. Prettyman asked whose authority the directive to continue was given to the Sheriff’s Department and, on response that it came from the Airport Commission suggested meeting with Commission members to determine the responsible party. Airport Manager Robert Bryant and Sheriff Nelms encouraged Council’s participation in this process. Mr. Bryant told Council this is the second time in thirty-years the Airport had to request Council assistance.  Mrs. Prettyman asked that the motion include a caveat that the Council meet with the Airport Commission.  Mr. Dashiell, the Council’s liaison to the Airport Commission, wished to assure Council that the Airport Manager, together with the Sheriff’s Department and Airport Commission have worked to find resolution to this mandated expenditure while maintaining the presence of law enforcement. The motion was amended and carried.

 

BOARD OF EDUCATION

 

The Board of Education requests Council approval to appropriate unanticipated State and other local revenue in the amount of $62,754.  The receipt of funding is attributed to reimbursement for out of County living arrangements for students placed in Wicomico County. In addition, the Board wished to expend the funds to defray costs for Wicomico County student placed in other jurisdictions; an additional $62,778 is needed to meet its total obligation.  On motion made by Mr. Taylor, seconded by Mr. Long, and unanimously carried, the Council approved the requests.

 

On motion made by Mr. Long, seconded by Mr. Dashiell, and unanimously carried, Council approved transfers of funds between major categories of the Board of Education’s Annual Budget for FY 2002-03 for the month of June, in the amount of $66,819. The Board also requests Council’s concurrence in transfers within major categories of its FY 2002-03 Annual Budget for the month of June, in the amount of $137,335. Council concurred. For information purposes and in accordance to a “gentlemen’s agreement” the Board is authorized to make transfers under $1,000 between categories and reports a transfer in the amount of $30. No action is requested.

 

BOARD OF LICENSE COMMISSIONERS

 

Mr. Shea recalled the Board of License Commissioners is in the process of a lawsuit. The Board previously requested and Council granted approval to transfer funds from its fine account to cover attorney fees. The Board now requests permission to encumber funds from its fine account to pay additional anticipated fees; at the onset of the new fiscal year no funds will be available in the fine account transfer. The Board believes a transfer of $8,000 would be sufficient.  The Director of Finance advises that, while the Board does not currently have the money, she anticipates funds would be available by the end of the fiscal year and, that the best solution would be a Contingency transfer. Mrs. Prettyman stated she did not favor a Contingency transfer and that the Board’s financial planning should have included unanticipated expenses. To that end, she motioned to wait until the end of the fiscal year to determine if funds are available and utilize the Board’s own revenue source. Mrs. Bartkovich seconded the motion. Mr. Taylor asked if a funding decision needed to be made before the next meeting and Mrs. Bartkovich was interested to know whether payment arrangements could be made or, if payment in full was required. On call for the question, Messrs. Dashiell, Taylor, Long, Dodd and Sarbanes voted yea, Mrs. Prettyman and Mrs. Bartkovich voted nay.  The motion failed. Mr. Dashiell made the following motion: if there are sufficient funds within the Board’s budget to meet the necessary expense those funds should be used and if not, the request becomes a transfer from Contingency.  Mr. Long seconded the motion. Mrs. Prettyman asked to amend the motion to earmark the funds and make payment directly to the attorney. Mr. Dashiell amended his motion and Mr. Long amended his second. On call for the question, the Council unanimously voted to allow the Board of License Commissioners to encumber funds up to $8,000 to pay attorney fees, which should be paid directly by the Department of Finance to the attorney in question. The $8,000 is to come from the Board's regular FY 2003 budget and any available unanticipated revenues during FY 2003, but if those sources did not total $8,000, the balance should come from Contingency.

 

Mrs. Prettyman introduced Walter Bell who will join the Board of License Commissioners, effective July 1,2003.

 

LOCAL MANAGEMENT BOARD

 

Mr. Shea recalled the need to relocate the office of the Local Management Board (LMB) and that Salisbury University had given consideration to renting to an outside entity. The University elected not to rent the space however the Board has located another suitable site on Riverside Drive, 1400 square feet for $10,850.  The Board requests permission to move to Public Hearing for the renting of space. On motion made by Mr. Dashiell, seconded by Mr. Taylor, and unanimously carried, Council approved.

 

R. HUNTER NELMS, SHERIFF

 

Request is made to transfer auction proceeds of the Narcotics Task Force to the Narcotics Task Force Operating Account. On motion made by Mr. Taylor, seconded by Mr. Dodd, and duly carried, Mrs. Prettyman was absent for the vote, Council granted approval to transfer $10,052.49 from Narcotics T ask Force to the Narcotics Task Force Operating Account. (Mrs. Prettyman returned before the next agenda item).

 

Sheriff Nelms and Captain Doris Schonbrunner reported the receipt of auction proceeds in the amount of $1909.10 from the sale of other surplus property. In maintaining the highest level of security, the Sheriff requests a carry-forward to offset costs to repair or replace hardware for locks.  In addition, Sheriff Nelms requests that $10,385 in insurance proceeds for a total loss vehicle, be carried forward for maintenance of existing aging fleet. Mr. Dashiell motioned to approve. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Prettyman and unanimously carried.

 

Mrs. Prettyman wished to commend the Sheriff and in particular, Deputy Michael Dolch for the demonstration featuring his drug-sniffing canine.  The Sheriff informed Council that Deputy Dolch purchased the canine with his own finances ($5,000), and donated it to Wicomico County for the duration of its useful life. 

 

Sheriff Nelms requested unanticipated revenue in the amount of $13,634.70, be credited to his Salary Account.  The funds represent reimbursement for staff overtime, primarily from the Board of Education. On motion made by Mrs. Prettyman, seconded by Mr. Taylor, and unanimously carried, Council approved the request.

 

 

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR

 

Mr. Shea advised that two of the three members of Wicomico County’s Health Care Consortium would realize positive results from the contract. Edward Cox, Director of Human Resources, requests Council’s concurrence to divide the settlement payment between the City of Salisbury and Wicomico County and deposit the funds into the reserve pool. On motion made by Mr. Long, seconded by Mr. Dashiell, and unanimously carried, Council accepted the recommendation.

 

MANUFACTURING TAX EXEMPTION

 

Helovet Pharma, Inc., formerly Wheaton Pharmatech, requests a manufacturing tax exemption on machinery and equipment used in the conduct of its business in Wicomico County for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2003, and forward. On motion made by Mr. Long, seconded by Mr. Dodd, and unanimously carried, Council approved the request.

 

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

 

Wicomico County has received notice that the Maryland Department of Transportation’s (MDOT) annual visit to the Lower Shore Counties is schedule for October 28. This public meeting will be pre-empted by a dinner at 5:30 p.m. with MDOT and other State officials.  The meeting is scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Wicomico Youth and Civic Center. 

 

DIRECTOR OF FINANCE

 

Mrs. Patricia Petersen submitted the Statement of Latest Investment Rates/Balances for All County Funds as of June 17, 2003 which reflects a total General Fund balance of $521,573; Capital Project Fund balance of $20,229,085. Total Major Non-Designated County Funds, $35,603,233.  Total Designated Reserves and “Rainy Day” Reserve Funds, $4,756,627.

 

Mrs. Petersen recalled the County’s interest in obtaining a new financial management system.  The County, the City of Salisbury and Board of Education have been working together to determine the feasibility of a joint purchase, which would require negotiation of costs. Through a series of meetings, the provider who appears to meet the critical needs of all 3 entities is MUNIS. The estimated maximum exposure to Wicomico County at this time is $500,000; which does not include discounts or cost savings and includes the purchase of all modules at one time, which may not have to occur. Mrs. Petersen said that phasing the purchase and use of modules over a two-year period could save $50,000 in first-year costs.  The $500,000 does include estimates for conversion of one year of data, training, on-sight consultation and joint implementation issues. Toward this end, Mrs. Petersen requested, with support of the Information Technology Director, Ray Micciche, that Council amend the Capital Improvement Budget for fiscal year 2004 to include $500,000 for new financial management software. Mr. Micciche presented an overview of the County’s present supplier and the likelihood of having obsolete equipment and equipment that is not compatible to advanced technology, which would hinder the business of the County. A lengthy discussion ensued with Mr. Long commending the departments for being mindful of the immediate changes that take place in computer systems and for the early planning to prepare the County for a transitional system. Mrs. Prettyman requested additional information on the system and cost projections.  Mrs. Petersen noted that actual conversion costs past the first year are not included, and there are many things to be worked out in the negotiation between the County, City and Board.  Cost drivers include the number of modules/users on line, the amount of conversion requested, and the actual consulting/training used, making the final cost to taxpayers unavailable at this time. The County Attorney advised a Public Hearing would be required to amend the Capital Improvement Budget.  Mr. Dodd agrees foresight is excellent as well as the concept of a partnering with the City of Salisbury and Board of Education however he, too, questioned the revenue source, to which Mrs. Petersen responded would be the bond market. Mr. Dashiell also asked if final costs could be determined, to which Mrs. Petersen responded would take further negotiating.  Mr. Taylor added he would support the recommendation of those put in place to advise them. Mrs. Bartkovich appreciated planning for the future however she expressed concern over how it’s done and, since there are two other entities involved she wished to have a written agreement. Following discussion, Mr. Long motioned that the County Attorney schedule a Public Hearing to consider the request as part of the current Capital Budget.  The motion was seconded by Mr. Taylor and duly carried. (Mrs. Prettyman was not present during the vote).

 

The report for Room Tax Collection for the month of April was submitted with two delinquent accounts.

 

At this point Mr. Dodd was excused from the meeting.  Mrs. Prettyman returned for the next agenda item.

 

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

 

Director P. Rai Sharma and Frederick Harris, Purchasing Agent reported that Wicomico County released a Request for Proposal for two 2002 tri-axle dump trucks. The RFP had specifications that included the ability to use previously purchased attachments. A pre-bid meeting was held to agree upon required specifications. Based on the lowest price offered meeting specifications, Mr. Harris recommends the award to Western Star, in the amount of $81,221.  On motion made by Mr. Long, seconded by Mr. Taylor, and unanimously carried, Council accepted the recommendation.

 

Mrs. Prettyman questioned the process by which the auctioneer was selected for the County’s bidding services. Mr. Harris explained a Request for Proposal (RFP) was sent to five vendors in the surrounding area. The RFP was to include costs and methods of advertising.  Two bids were received and Marshall Auction provided the most comprehensive plan. Vendors receive notification by newspaper advertisement, the County’s website, and E-Maryland Market Place.

 

On motion made by Mrs. Prettyman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, and unanimously carried, Council renewed mobile home park licenses for the period June 30, 2003 through July 1, 2004.  Mrs. Prettyman remarked that in fairness to park owners who comply with County regulations, a mechanism should be considered for those who do not comply, often times after an extension has been granted. Mr. Baker will research.

 

Howard and Eileen Bennett, for a mobile home park known as, Bennett Mobile Home Park and located on Naylor Mill Road, Salisbury, Maryland.

 

Mike Houlihan, Country Estates, Inc., for a mobile home park known as, Gateway Village and located on Rt. 675 and Shell Road, Delmar, Maryland.

 

Glynn and Gladys Bridges, for a mobile home park known as, Hebron Woods and located on U. S. Route 50, Hebron, Maryland.

 

Mrs. John Walston, for a mobile home park known as, John Walston Mobile Home Park and located on Walston Switch Road and Shavox Road, Salisbury, Maryland.

 

Mike Houlihan, M & T Enterprises, Inc., for a mobile home park known as, West Side Mobile Park, located on Nanticoke Road, Salisbury, Maryland.

 

Upon motion made by Mr. Dashiell, seconded by Mrs. Prettyman, and unanimously carried, the following streets are ready to be taken in to the County Road system for maintenance:

Pointers Run, Section Two

 Setter Court

 Spaniel Court.

 

On motion made by Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Taylor, and unanimously carried, the following street was taken into the County Road system for maintenance:

Carriage Square, Section Two

 Carriage Lane.

 

Mrs. Prettyman called attention to a house on Nottingham Drive that is in dire need of lawn care and requested the proper authority investigate. Mr. Sharma will give the information to the appropriate department for investigation.

 

The Litter Control and Ditching Reports for the month of May were submitted.

 

EDGAR A. BAKER, JR., COUNTY ATTORNEY

 

Pursuant to regulations in Section 200-13G of Chapter 200 of the County Code, Mr. Baker requested the scheduling of a public hearing on behalf of Adventure Farms, Section Two, Modification to Open Space/Set Aside. He explained the procedure to modify requires a public hearing and two-thirds vote of the County Council.  On motion made by Mr. Long, seconded by Mr. Dodd, and duly carried with Mr. Taylor not present for the vote, Council approved the request.

 

On motion made by Mr. Long, seconded by Mr. Dashiell, and duly carried, with Mr. Taylor not present for the vote, Council adopted Resolution No. 566, Authorizing Filing of Application by the Tri-County Council for the Lower Eastern Shore of Maryland to the Maryland Transit Administration for a Section 5307, 5311 and/or 5307 grant, under the Federal Transit Act.

 

At this point Mr. Taylor re-joined the meeting.

 

PLANNING, ZONING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

 

Mr. Jack Lenox, Director, came before Council to overview a list of issues pertinent to comprehensive planning and how it relates to zoning.  Council received a memorandum outlining the summary of work to be performed, necessary resources, and recommended sequence for: Zoning Code Updates; Water & Sewer Master Plan; Metro Core Comprehensive Plan, and County-Wide Comprehensive Plan. Recognizing a substantial commitment of time will be required to study these projects, Mrs. Bartkovich suggested, and Council concurred, to begin work session in early July.  Mr. Lenox requested that in order to accomplish the work Council fill the vacant Community Development Planner position in the FY 04 budget.  On motion made by Mr. Long, seconded by Mrs. Prettyman, and unanimously carried, Council authorized the Planner position to be filled.

 

Regarding the Water and Sewer Master Plan, Mr. Lenox reported proposed estimates to retain the services of a professional engineering and planning consulting firm is estimated at $55,000.  The 2004 Capital Improvement Budget includes $80,000 for an East Corridor Water and Sewer Study to evaluate specific options for wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal along East Route 50, necessitating many of the same types of expertise and analysis as the Master Plan. Mr. Lenox suggests integrating the two studies could produce a savings of an estimated $30,000. In an effort to reduce costs, he requests Council provide an additional $25,000 for a combined services.  On motion made by Mr. Long, seconded by Mr. Taylor and unanimously carried, Council approved the request to amend the Capital Improvement Budget as recommended, for a single project totaling $105,000.

 

WICOMICO TRANSIT

 

Superintendent Rick Dwyer reported at the end of fiscal year 2003 the agency would realize a balance of  $30,000 of indirect funding as a result of the Maryland Transit Administration’s compensation to Wicomico County for services render in fiscal year 2002.  Historically, Council has authorized a transfer to the Transit Escrow Account.  If funds are not transferred, they revert to the Maryland Transportation Administration for distribution. To ensure no disruption to ridership and to ensure the utilization of funds for ridership, Wicomico Transit request Council authorize the transfer. On motion made by Mrs. Prettyman, seconded by Mr. Taylor, and unanimously carried, Council authorized the transfer.

 

PUBLIC COMMENTS

 

There were no public comments.

 

COUNTY COUNCIL COMMENTS

 

There were no County Council Comments.

 

The County Attorney advised, in accordance to Section 10 – (508) of the State Government Articles of the Annotated Code of Maryland, the County Council reserves the right to close a portion of this meeting. Motion to close was offered by Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Taylor, and unanimously carried.

 

Wicomico County Council reconvened in Executive Session at approximately 1:15 p.m.

Mr. Dodd was excused.

 

HOLLY CENTER DISCUSSION

 

Messrs Ken Matthews, Lewis Riley, David Grier, Andrew Booth and Mark Engberg, accompanied by numerous supporters, came before Council to discuss the possible closing of the Holly Center facility.  Each shared an extensive history of the Holly Center and the services that it provides to individuals with profound disabilities.  Mr. Engberg explained that there is a movement nationwide, to close such institutions and replace them with alternative care and community placement arrangements.  It was explained that there have been no new admissions at Holly Center since 1996 and the facility is under-utilized; however, there are approximately 700 families on the Eastern Shore in need of such services.  On the local level, Delegate Norman H. Conway has begun the process of having budget language adopted and incorporated in the State’s DDA budget, requiring admissions to Holly Center and other similar Centers. In addition, a local Task Force is working to determine how to better utilize the facility and offer an expanded range of services.  Mr. Engberg and Mr. Booth asked Council to support this initiative by appealing to Governor Ehrlich to reconsider the closure of Holly Center and similar facilities and to support the concept of converting these facilities to Community Resource Centers. 

 

Council members made several inquiries regarding effective ways to bring attention to this issue.  On motion of Mr. Dashiell, seconded by Mr. Taylor, and duly carried, Council agreed to send a letter of support for the continued operation of Holly Center and the concept of Community Resource Centers to Governor Ehrlich and other State officials.  There was a brief discussion of Governor Ehrlich’s visit to Salisbury on June 23rd.  Mr. Matthews and Mr. Engberg expressed their appreciation for Council’s response to the request.

 

PLANNING, ZONING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Discussion of Potential Land Use

 

John Lenox, Director, and P. Rai Sharma, Director, Public Works, came before Council to discuss a letter from Mr. William Twilley, who opposes a portion of the Wicomico County Comprehensive Plan and zoning regarding set-aside restrictions for future subdivisions. Mr. Twilley takes exception to regulations that affect a 101-acre tract of farmland that he owns.  If Mr. Twilley sells 50 acres of that tract to a prospective buyer, the remainder of the tract must remain agriculture or open space.  Mr. Twilley stated that this severely de-values such land; and that many farmers considered owning acreage as their retirement investment.  Mr. Sharma explained that when the County established the original zoning codes, certain provisions were made in the subdivision code whereby any property owner could separate out three lots, (considered a minor subdivision), that could receive review and approval in-house by Public Works.  With a revised Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1998, property owners could subdivide a specific number of lots from a large parcel; once that number had been reached, any other subdivision had to comply with major development regulations.  Mr. Lenox also explained that the County zoning map shows that a large majority of land in the County is agricultural; from the time up to the change in 1998, there was no minimum lot size nor was there a maximum density requirement contained in the agricultural zoning regulations.  Following extensive review, the conclusion was reached that conventional development (this includes minor and major subdivision developments) should reflect development of one unit per 15 acres in agricultural zones.  However, an alternative was offered to property owners whereby the “cluster” formula could be applied to develop more lots at a higher density, but required that one-half the land be set aside for open space. 

           

Mrs. Prettyman expressed her concern for property owners who might experience a similar situation, stating they should receive either just compensation or assurance that the land is still as valuable as it was prior to the restrictions now in effect.  Mr. Taylor, too, expressed similar concerns.   Mr. Sarbanes stated that these restrictions were imposed, in part, to help control growth; Mrs. Prettyman remarked that while these restrictions were imposed with good intentions, there are unintentional consequences that penalize property owners.  Mrs. Prettyman asked how Council could correct it.  Mr. Lenox responded, stating that while zoning does  reduce the value of someone’s property;  the past Council adopted the Comprehensive Plan to impose guidelines to address unrestricted growth, keeping in mind that such regulations do not unreasonably affect ownership or value.  Mr. Baker, County Attorney, agreed that placing reasonable regulations for the benefit of the entire community does not constitute “taking” that land, for which compensation must be paid.   Mr. Twilley remarked that he was not aware of the revised agricultural zoning regulations and its ramifications, along with many other farmers.  Mr. Baker responded that before the legislation was enacted, many landowners approached the County to request a revision to modify open space and attended the public hearing; consequently, the legislation was revised.

 

Mr. Twilley added that during the subdivision plat review by the Planning Commission, he learned of the development restriction on the remaining property.  He considers the remaining portion as the most valuable, since it is located very closely to the entrance of the new highway and planned to sell it as commercial land.  This is an option not available to him since it must remain agricultural or open space. 

 

Mr. Sharma reviewed a map identifying each subdivision of the tract of land in question,  to show that Mr. Twilley had exhausted the number of parcels that could be subdivided under the minor subdivision guidelines. 

 

Mrs. Prettyman then asked Mr. Baker if an exception would apply or perhaps the set- aside could be modified.  Mr. Baker offered that a possible alternative would be if the buyer agreed to develop a small portion and designate one-half of their remaining land as open space.  The salient point is to have 50 contiguous acres designated as open space.   Mr. Twilley then could designate an adjoining 25 acres of open space.  Mr. Twilley agreed this would be acceptable.  Mr. Baker gave examples of this practice in subdivisions. The question of whether this land was considered outside of the Metro Core in 1998 was also discussed.  Mr. Baker reminded all that the County never adopted the

Metro Core Plan.  Also questioned was whether transferable development rights are a consideration in this issue.  It was generally agreed that County staff should again review the parcel in question to determine its proper designation.

 

At the request of Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Baker stated the quickest solution for Mr. Twilley is to speak with the buyer (a church organization) to discuss the concept of using a portion of their property as open space.  County staff will also be available to meet with Mr. Twilley and his buyer to provide information.

 

Mr. Twilley concluded with a request that landowners need to be made aware of the development restrictions placed upon agriculturally-zoned land.  Mr. Sarbanes said Council would give this attention.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR

 

Mr. Shea discussed with Council the fact that there will be 27 County pay periods this year; however, there are certain agencies that are state-mandated to have a maximum salary amount paid during the year. The options are to either divide such salaries into 27 pay periods or maintain the 26 pay period schedule, with no payment during the 27th pay period.  Mr. Shea recommends that Council consider converting the affected salaried positions to the 27-pay period cycle.  On motion of Mr. Dashiell, seconded by Mr. Taylor, and unanimously carried, Council approved Mr. Shea’s recommendation.

 

With no further business to come before the County Council the meeting was adjourned.

 

                                                            _________________________________                              Anthony Sarbanes, President

 

                                                            __________________________________

                                                            Charles R. Dashiell, Jr., Vice President

 

                                                            __________________________________

                                                            Edward T. Taylor, District 1

 

                                                            __________________________________

                                                            Stevie Prettyman, District 2

 

                                                            __________________________________

                                                            Gail M. Bartkovich, District 3

 

                                                            __________________________________

                                                            Marvin R. Long, District 4

 

                                                            __________________________________

                                                            Larry W. Dodd, District 5

 

 

 

_________________________________

Theodore E. Shea, II

Administrative Director